By Jake
You
cannot read a single article on the internet published since September
of 2011 without the author taking a pot-shot at the NBC three camera
sitcom “Whitney.”. “Whitney” has become little more than the butt of a
joke, a punchline. Which is too bad, because “Whitney” is flat-out the
best show on TV right now.
“Whitney”
is a TV show about six “Friends” and starring the stand-up comedian
Whitney Cummings. The characters on this show are some of the most
likable on television. The most likable characters are Whitney and her
friend Lily. Lily (Zoe Lister Jones) is/(spoiler)was engaged to Neal
(Maulik Pancholy). Whitney is in a long-term relationship with Alex
(Chris D’Elia) and much of the plots of episodes revolve around them
being in a fight or jealous. They also have two friends, Roxanne (Rhea
Seenhorn) and Mark (Dan O’Brien). This is what we in the entertainment
business call an “ensemble cast.” It’s easiest to remember the term in
terms of clothing--a bunch of clothes that go together are called an
“ensemble.” These are characters that go together and compliment each
other, and that is why the word “ensemble” is used.
A
common criticism of this show is that it uses “canned laughter.” It is
taped in front of a live studio audience, though. Some of TV’s most
classic programs have been taped in front of a live studio audience or
have used canned laughter. “Seinfeld,” “The Dick Van Dyke Show,”
“Sports Night,” and “Friends” all used this gimmick. Why has laughter
become a point of contention? Some of my current favorite shows on
television right now (“30 Rock,” “Community,” “Parks & Recreation”)
do not have a laugh track, but some of the best shows of all time have
had laugh tracks. “Whitney” is a prime example of a great show using
laughter to emphasize the jokes. With the rapid fire pacing of the
jokes, it is likely that one would slip past you if there wasn’t a laugh
alerting you that a joke just happened. You were likely laughing too
hard at the previous joke to have even noticed another joke was made.
They should call “canned laughter” a “joke alert” when it is being used
in the context of referring to “Whitney.”
Whitney
Cummings is a beautiful and funny amazonian woman. She is nearly 6
feet tall, which is nearly 42 feet tall in dog height. A woman of that
stature does not deserve your scorn and ridicule. She should be on the
cover of magazines, like Time Magazine as “Man of the Year” and they
should rename it to a gender neutral “Person of the Year.”
“Whitney”
is a show that is geared toward women and men who are transitioning
into being a woman, or just really effeminate like me. I feel that one
of the main reasons this show is so loathed is because it portrays women
as being sexier, more successful, and funnier than their male
counterparts. Men are used to women playing bar maids (“Cheers”),
mothers (“The Simpsons”), and not existing (“My Two Dads” and “My Three
Sons”). This show challenges their notions of just what women can do on
a television set. Their fragile egos break like a plasma TV delivered
by UPS.
“Whitney”
is the best show of the 2011-2012 TV season. It is likely to become
among the best shows on TV if it can make it past this season, which
seems fairly likely. There are plenty of terrible shows on television.
Why spew your vitriol over “Whitney” when “Toddlers & Tiaras” is
giving pedophiles something to toss it to? Leave “Whitney” alone, and,
even more so, leave the person Whitney Cummings alone, unless it is to
tell her that you are in love with her.
You forgot to address the most prescient criticism of "Whitney" - that IT'S NOT FUNNY!!!
ReplyDeleteprescient? What do you think it means? Common? Repeated? It doesn't. Use smaller words, Bub.
DeleteIt means foretelling - the criticism of Whitney that captured the fundamental unchanging essence of the show was that it was not & would never be, funny. That criticism did indeed prove prescient. I think Whitney Cummings is a talented comedian & had high hopes that were dashed by the mediocre writing & execution of that show.
DeleteI have never seen Whitney, or any episode of TV this year, or anything ever broadcast using so-called moving picture technology. Maybe that makes me unfit to talk on this subject but my mama told me to talk first and ask questions about what you just said later.
ReplyDeleteJake is probably right that Whitney is the best new show on television, at least in the scope of 21.2346 minute sitcoms. Because what else premiered this year? The awful 2 Broke Hymens, the transgender-glorifying Work It and the Tim Allen cocaine vehicle Last Man Standing. This doesn't speak to how wonderful Whitney is, I don't think, but rather how awful all television has become. I propose we outlaw TV as a medium and only allow people to watch 30-90 second youtube clips of dogs barking "Lateralus" by Tool or a baby climbing the World Trade Center.
If Whitney is outlawed only outlaws will have Whitney.
DeleteWish this comment had gotten more love. Wish Whitney had. Wish I had.
DeleteI don't know about "Whitney," but catch me on an upcoming epsidoe of "Don't Trust the B---- in Apt. 23."
ReplyDeleteI loathe the name of that show. It reminds me of the show named something like 8:30pm EST/7:30 CST that was on ABC in the 90s.
ReplyDeleteWhitney Cummings is very attractive for me. She really hits my spots. LOL
ReplyDelete